![]() ![]() Supreme Court is going to say to all of them, you must have the rapist`s baby. The Supreme Court is going to say that every woman in America, to every teenage girl, to every 12 year old child, raped by her father or uncle or neighbor in Mississippi or Alabama or Texas or several other states. The Supreme Court is going to say, it is entirely up to politicians. The Supreme Court is going to say, it is not up to them. That is corrupting the Constitution.Īnd now, the constitutionally corrupted Supreme Court is working on a draft opinion, in which five Supreme Court justices, only one of whom was appointed by a Republican president, who actually got the most votes in the presidential election, will for the first time in the country`s history, revoke a constitutional right - the constitutional right for women and girls and children who get pregnant, to decide what happens next inside their own bodies. By refusing to even vote on President Obama`s nominee to the Supreme Court, Mitch McConnell said set up the stupidest president in history to appoint one third of the Supreme Court, using a list of possible nominees, given to him by Mitch McConnell. ![]() And the president`s stupidity is dangerous.Īnd thanks to the corruption of the Constitution, which has turned down to be a much weaker document than we thought, Mitch McConnell refused to follow the constitutional requirements of the Senate giving the president of the United States advice and consent on President Obama`s last Supreme Court nominee. O`DONNELL: Unfortunately, that is a completely believable story in a Trump republic, because Donald Trump is obviously by a gigantic order of magnitude, the stupidest man who has ever won the Electoral College. MADDOW: The leak this week into the Washington Post, where we learned about what, you know, what`s happened in conference, and what John Roberts supposed intentions were, and what he planned to write, and how many justices were on board with each ruling, and or concurrence, and each point in time? It basically told the story of the opinion, and so, there was a kind of a sequence of leaks. There was that lead to "The Wall Street Journal" editorial board, earlier before this leak ever came out, which with without doubt didn`t have to include the opinion. The question though, with the political impact inside the court was, of somebody leaking it? Did it, in fact, as a lot of smart people said, sort of freeze the basis of the opinion in play, so that now, none of the conservative justices, Republican appointed justices is going to feel like they`re going to get too far away from that, in terms of what they sign on to with the court? I mean, the dynamic is one of the big wildcards, in terms of predicting whether ruling is ultimately going to look like. One has to assume that that weapon would have gotten stronger, because it was a hot mess, to use illegal term. I wouldn`t want the world to have access to the first draft of anything that I did, even if it wasn`t as earth shattering as what they`re trying to do with that opinion. badvibes, Effective Alaska, Executive Producer, father of zazie and fruit snacks, folkface, food court baby, fosse, FourLegsGood, Fr.MADDOW: I mean, I wouldn`t want anybody to have access to a first draft. Users browsing this forum: actor.ltx, Annie May, BanEmAll Collective, Barthes Starr, bat house, bigd*ckenergydrink, bobble, Bobbyslegs, brittle, building jumper, buriedinspace, cheezborg91, conductor, Cone, creedence tapes, Cronos, Crud, darger, DeVito, doormat, down with homework, dr. Return to Peanut Butter and Jelly Talk Jump to: Who is online ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |